Walking the Dream: Immigrant College Students Push for Reform

Originally published in The Indypendent.

Miami-Dade Community College student Felipe Matos has a new schedule this spring semester. Each day starts with a 5:30 a.m. wake-up call, a big breakfast, a quick stretch and securing his feet with a thick layer of duct tape. Then Matos sets off for a 17-mile walk interspersed by several breaks of singing songs, and later stops to sleep in a different place every night — RVs, churches or even strangers’ homes.

The thick blisters that have developed on his feet after walking 250 miles beg him to stop. But this semester of learning has only just begun. Along with three other immigrant students, Matos, 23, is trekking 1,500 miles in a five-month campaign that launched Jan. 1 from Miami and will end in Washington, D.C., to rally in support of “education not deportation” for undocumented youth and their families.

“It was hitting home and it was time for us to get up and act,” said Gaby Pacheco, 25, an undocumented immigrant living in Miami, whose family is in deportation proceedings. “Our communities couldn’t wait anymore,” said Pacheco, a music therapy student at Miami-Dade College.

Four youth will walk the entirety of the trip — Pacheco, Matos and two other students, Carlos Roa, 22, an architecture student at Miami-Dade, and Juan Rodriguez, 20, who recently became a permanent resident and hopes to study sociology in Chicago.

Named the “Trail of Dreams,” the walk has four guiding goals: a pathway to citizenship, greater access to education, workers’ rights and the end of the separation of families. The campaign was launched by Students Working for Equal Rights, the Florida Immigration Coalition and presente.org, a group that works to promote the political empowerment of Latino communities.

“It’s courageous and inspiring what these young people are doing,” said Norman Eng, director of media relations at the New York Immigration Coalition. “It’s been a very effective way to highlight the plight of immigrants like themselves. I think we’re all marching with them in spirit.”

The Trail of Dreams comes at a time when immigrant-rights groups across the country have mobilized to reinvigorate the push for the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act (DREAM Act) introduced in 2001 to offer a route to legal residency to graduating undocumented high school students living in the country for more than five years.

A report by College Board Advocacy, “Young Lives on Hold: The College Dreams of Undocumented Students,” found that 65,000 undocumented students living in the country for more than five years graduate from high school annually. While they can legally attend most colleges, they are not eligible for financial aid.

The laws vary by state and are a source of confusion due to constantly fluctuating state and local policies. Only 10 states allow undocumented students to pay in-state tuition rates. Current New York policy states that undocumented youth need to be enrolled in an in-state high school for two years to be eligible for in-state tuition. Higher education is just not an option for many undocumented students who have no access to financial aid and no legal authorization to work.

Approximately two million undocumented children live in the United States, roughly 15 percent of the entire undocumented population.

The Trail of Dreams marchers stop every day at lunch to meet with churches, organizations, schools and state and local representatives to exchange stories of struggle and words of hope.

“Listening to little children that [are] five that understand that their parents could get deported and they could be torn apart from them,” says Matos, is so far proving to be the hardest part of the journey.

While the march is inspiring organizations nationwide to continue working for comprehensive immigration reform, the organizers say they are not campaigning for any specific law or policy.

“What we’re setting out to do is change the hearts and minds of people,” Pacheco said.

Still crossing through northern Florida, the four students will continue to walk until arriving in Washington on May 1, a national day of worker and immigrant rights.

Pacheco said that it’s time for young immigrant communities to stop living in fear.

“We’re coming out of the shadows, we’re going into the light and saying, ‘Here we are, the undocumented youth that have so much potential and so much desire to make this country a better country.’”

Job Soul Searching

I am in a mid, mid-life crisis. But I’d like to believe I’m en route to self-discovery.

I graduate in May and am strongly crossing my fingers that I won’t join the ranks of the unemployed.

I tell people the market is tough and journalists might be the new starving artists just in case I end up as the face of the future homeless, buried in my $100,000 debt from NYU (thank you John Sexton). Still, deep down I know I can find a job or at least make one up. After all, I’m positive my generation will be working in jobs that have yet to be created.

My problem is I don’t know how to get to the type of job I want or how to get there through economically viable means. I wake up every morning with a new idea, some bordering on lunacy (join the circus; start up an ‘Ace of Cakes’ Latino-style in my hometown Miami; spin a globe, shut my eyes tight and let ‘fate’ guide my finger to a destination where I’ll live for a year or so). And I’ve actually followed through on my post-grad fantasies. I’ve taken to cake decorating where I’ve gained a much-needed 5 pounds (for the second time in my life I have reached a three digit number, 101 pounds!), and I’ve even gone to Trapeze School where I’m still recovering from the exhaustive full body workout that it is (I’m small and flexible, maybe Circ de Soleil will take me?). I’m going to Cuzco in March to hike up to Choquequirao, Macchu Picchu’s sister city and if I can deal with the lack of hygiene, maybe the backpacker’s life is for me.

Tomorrow is my last first day of school. I have four months to write a thesis, graduate, find a job and oh, maybe a place to live.

So here’s to a semester of job soul searching!

It’s no walk in the park for day laborers

By Karen Yi and Jaisal Noor

First published on the The Indypendent

Nearly every day along Broadway and 69th Street in Jackson Heights, Queens, day laborers — mostly undocumented immigrants — line up and wait for someone to come by and offer them a job. On Tuesday mornings, jobs or no jobs, day laborers gather nearby in Hart Park to chow down on a free hot meal provided by St. John’s Bread and Life program.

But on Tuesday, Sept. 22, the day laborers got a different type of treat.

According to witnesses, their meal was interrupted when the New York Police Department arrived to sweep the more than 80 laborers out of the local public park.

Roberto Meneses, president of Day Laborers United, said the police kicked them out, claiming only adults with children were allowed inside. He believes the police were responding to complaints by local residents, concerned about the growing number of day laborers in and near the park.

New York City Department of Parks and Recreation signs posted on the fences read, “Playground Rules Prohibit: Adults Except in the Company of Children.” But according to Kathy Byrnes, director of the mobile soup kitchen program, the signs are misleading.

There are “distinct areas” designated for adult use, like the basketball courts, she said. “What needs to take place now is the clarification of this playground … in a language that people read.” The signs are in English while most of the day laborers only speak and read Spanish.

Park employees beg to differ. Employees at Hart Park, questioned about the rules, pointed to the sign and said, “Read the sign. This park is only for adults with children.”

Several day laborers said that park employees routinely force them out of the park, while the police often issue them tickets for “using the benches” and for “public disturbance,” claiming the park is off-limits to adults not accompanying children.

According to other sources, park employees, as well as the NYPD, seem to be enforcing their own interpretation of the rule.

Official park regulations, according to Phil Abramson, a spokesperson for the City Department of Parks and Recreation, state that adults without children are allowed inside Hart Park in all areas except those clearly designated playground by colored pavement around playground equipment.

“The park is open to anyone,” Abramson said, “the restrooms are open to anyone [as are] the benches.” He said that this is the first time he has heard of confusion over the posted signs.

However, this debate over park access has been longstanding.

Back in 2004, New York State Assemblyman Jose Peralta (D-Queens) worked to mitigate similar tensions resulting from the presence of day laborers. According to his Chief of Staff Yonel Letellier, Peralta helped broker an agreement between the Parks and Recreation department and the advocacy group Day Laborers Project to allow the use of benches and bathrooms by the laborers.

Day laborers “should have access by law,” to the park, said Letellier, “but sometimes things don’t work the way they should.”

The NYPD did not respond to repeated interview requests by The Indypendent.

Five years later, and 21 months into the economic recession, the dramatic increase in day laborers seems to be fueling local tensions, as more people are pouring into the streets soliciting work and showing up for the Tuesday meal.

Byrnes says she’s seen a “40 to 45 percent increase” in the number of day laborers requesting food over last year. “That alone tells me about the economic need and how many people are still around without a job at this hour in the morning,” she said.

As the New York City unemployment rate hits double digits — 10.3 percent for the month of September — Meneses says there are more than 600 laborers around the Jackson Heights streets on any given day.

On Sept. 29, more than 40 day laborers and immigrant rights activists held a protest in response to the police action. They rallied for the right of day laborers to solicit work in the area and for the continuation of the Bread and Life program inside the park.

Felix Cruz Ortiz, coordinator of Day Laborers United said, “They’ve been giving us tickets and arresting us for no reason. What they’re doing is an injustice.”

Letellier said he’s working to address these ongoing concerns. “Right now we are in the middle of coordinating a meeting to explain to [the day laborers] what’s going on, to let them bring forth their tickets, and let the legal experts find out if their human rights have been violated,” he said.

Despite Community Effort, Judge Orders Brooklyn Resident Deported

The much-anticipated meeting to craft comprehensive immigration reform finally took place on June 25, whereby President Barack Obama committed to pass immigration reform by 2010. Meeting with both Democratic and Republican lawmakers, the debate touched on issues of legalization, border security and workplace enforcement.

But last week’s discussion has left the case of at least one Jamaican immigrant from Brooklyn on the fringe. Charged with minor drug convictions nearly two decades past, Roxroy Salmon, 52, has crossed an administrative threshold barring him from legally remaining in this country. Under the 1996 Illegal Immigrant Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, minor offenses such as shoplifting are reason enough to deport immigrants whether documented or not. The 1996 laws passed under the Clinton administration applied retroactively to those already convicted of misdemeanors, making Salmon’s drug convictions in the ’80s reason enough for deportation.

On July 7, around 40 of Salmon’s supporters gathered outside 26 Federal Plaza awaiting the final decision by the immigration judge on whether Salmon could remain in the U.S. with his four American-born children.

Singing songs and holding hands in prayer, members from Families for Freedom, The New Sanctuary Movement and First Presbyterian Church congregated at 8 a.m. for over four hours.

Inside, after a 30-minute hearing, Salmon was ordered deported but allowed to return home for the time being.

“It was the best outcome we were realistically expecting,” said David Wilson, member of First Presbyterian Church. “We were just hoping they weren’t going to seize him on the spot.”

Salmon has been fighting his deportation case since 2001, joining Families for Freedom, an organization for immigrants facing deportation.

Coming out of 26 Federal Plaza, teary-eyed Salmon was received with warm applause and cheers. “I’m just going to go about doing what I do everyday — raising my family, being a father, being a grandfather, being a husband, being a member of my community,” said Salmon. But with a deportation order on his head, Salmon will continue living in a state of uncertainty. “[ICE] can pick me up any time and do what they want to do,” he said.

“The judge today ruled the only way she had a legal option to rule in this case because after the 1996 legislation, the judge no longer has discretion,” said Wilson. “[The judge] can’t take circumstances into account, can’t take the impact on the rest of the family into account.”

Community organizers and Wangyong Austin, Salmon’s attorney, are continuing the struggle to keep him here. Now that Salmon has a deportation order, Austin will file for deferred action status to Christopher Shanahan Field Office Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Salmon’s application fro deferred status includes a letter of support from House Representative Edolphus Towns, from the 10th Congressional District of New York, a petition signed by more than 1,200 supporters and letters of support from faith leaders, community organizers and students.

Under deferred action, Salmon’s deportation order would not be enforced, granting him temporary relief from deportation. “He would be allowed to remain in the United States, pending good behavior and would be allowed to stay with his family and support his family,” said Wang, “but it wouldn’t give him any right to become a citizen.”

Families for Freedom is also campaigning for the Child Citizen Protection Act (CCPA) introduced by Senator Serrano in January. “Where there are U.S. citizen children involved,” the CCPA would “let the judge, judge,” says Wilson. “In a case like [Salmon's], a judge could look at the whole picture, not just check the box and say o.k., they’re out of status, and they have criminal convictions.”

A Mother’s Nightmare: A Senegalese Woman Struggles to Save Her Daughters

Having survived female genital mutilation when she was three years old in Senegal, Fatoumata does not want her four U.S.-born daughters to face the same violence. But as an undocumented immigrant at risk of deportation, the past Fatoumata fought to leave behind might be catching up to her children.

Fatoumata, who requested that her last name be withheld, is fighting her case in U.S. immigration courts. If her application for political asylum is denied, then she faces the unenviable dilemma of either separating from her children, who have U.S. citizenship, or moving them back to Senegal where her family is demanding her daughters undergo the traditional genital cutting.

“What we see is that the U.S. asylum system at present is widely inconsistent in resolving gender-based claims,” said Jeanne Smoot, director of public policy at the Tahirih Justice Center, a nongovernmental organization that works to protect women and girls from gender-based violence. “There really is a lack of recognition, a lack of clear compassion for the fact that obviously a fear of persecution to one’s children really is a fear of persecution to oneself.”

More than 14 years ago, Fatoumata arrived in the United States with her husband and settled in New York City. Her husband immediately applied for political asylum, listing her for “derivative status,” a provision that helps protect spouses and children. His application was denied. Fatoumata’s lawyer could not comment on the case.

Fatoumata and her husband, however, remained in the United States illegally and began a family. Thirteen years and six children later, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrested Fatoumata’s husband on July 20, 2007. She said that ICE arrived at their home in the middle of the night, taking Fatoumata and her children by surprise.

“My children were in the bed that time,” Fatoumata said. “They were shaking,” because of “the way ICE was acting, yelling, screaming. They have flashlights, they carry the guns, they were going all over the house.”

The house raid, and subsequent deportation of her husband four months later, left Fatoumata struggling as a single mom with six kids. Without legal status to work, Fatoumata has no means of earning a steady income and has recently moved into the New York City shelter system, relying on $731 in food stamps a month to feed her family.

“We came so we can make a family and a better place, that’s our dream,” Fatoumata said, “but I don’t know. It’s getting worse for us.”

Although female genital mutilation is illegal in Senegal, enforcement is very weak, explains Taina Bien-Aimé, executive director of Equality Now, an international human rights organization dedicated to women’s rights. “It is such a strong cultural tradition and it’s also very difficult for the child to go and complain,” Bien-Aimé said.

PROTECTING HER FAMILY: Five of Fatoumata’s six children hold her tight. Having already lost their father, they say they are afraid their mother will be deported, too. To protect her identity, Fatoumata covers her face. PHOTO: KAREN YI

Although the procedure varies in each country and village, Bien-Aimé described a typical scenario of female genital mutilation: “A number of women hold the girl down — one at her head, one at each arm. They open her legs and then they just take whatever they have available — a razor, a sharp knife, sometimes a stone — and they start slicing. It is generally done without anesthesia and in very unsanitary conditions.” The procedure involves the partial or total removal of the external female genitalia.

This scene could await Fatoumata’s four daughters, 6, 9, 11 and 13 years old. Facing heavy pressure from her family back in Senegal to have her daughters subjected to the cutting, Fatoumata fears the worst. “If I go back [to Senegal] I don’t have any power to stop them,” she said.

Female genital mutilation is most commonly performed between the ages of four and eight, but it can take place from infancy to adolescence. It is considered one of the worst violations listed in the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child. Amnesty International estimates that, as of 2005, more than 136 million women worldwide have been affected by some form of genital cutting.

If Fatoumata is not granted political asylum, she could be deported back to Senegal. Rather than leave her six children in foster care, Fatoumata says she’ll take them with her. But with the safety of her kids on the line, Fatoumata is fighting for a way to stay here, and she is not alone.

A coalition of immigrant rights and faithbased groups have formed a defense committee for Fatoumata, providing advocacy and resources and promoting public awareness. Two years ago Fatoumata filed a motion to reopen her asylum case. The motion was denied by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) and is currently waiting to be heard in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Joshua Bardavid, Fatoumata’s pro-bono immigration attorney, said he expects her case to be denied based on a procedural hurdle established by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. Under the 1996 laws, a person cannot reopen his or her case more than 90 days after the case is decided.

Bardavid, however, is working on a new motion to reopen her case based on evidence that asylum status is needed in order to protect her daughters.

While the 1996 case of Fauziya Kasinga established female genital mutilation as a reason for political asylum, Smoot said, “The law at present doesn’t provide a clear means for parents seeking to protect their children to be granted asylum.”

“Fatoumata’s case is really emblematic of what’s wrong with the system,” said Janis Rosheuvel, director of Families for Freedom, an immigrant rights organization.

“To make the impossible choice between those two terrible extremes — either to place their daughters at risk but keep their families together or remove that risk only by surrendering those girls to grow a world apart from them, in our opinion, effectively threatens to create a foster class of girls who are left behind here and families that are separated in order to secure the girls’ protection,” Smoot said.

Since the United States approves the applications of just over 20 percent of the political asylum cases each year, Fatoumata faces an uphill battle. According to statistics from the U.S. Department of Justice’s Executive Office of Immigration Review, the Immigration Courts granted about 10,700 of about 47,400 asylum cases in fiscal year 2008.

“When I think about why Fatoumata not deserves, but needs, to stay here, I can just count to six … her six kids who are all U.S. citizens,” Rosheuvel said.

Politics and Popcorn

Gearing up for his final deportation hearing, Jamaican immigrant Roxroy Salmon together with Families for Freedom sponsored an event on May 5, to talk about immigration politics — with a mouthful of popcorn.

Families for Freedom, a New York City based organization fighting against the deportation and subsequent separation of families, hosted the event “Politics and Popcorn” at First Presbyterian Church to educate the community about the immigration system and tell the story of one immigrant facing deportation and separation from his American born children.

Having been in the U.S. for more than 30 years, Roxroy Salmon risks being sent back to Jamaica for minor drug convictions from 20 years ago. Under the 1996 immigration laws, minor crimes, including drug offenses, are an automatic reason to deport immigrants — illegal and legal — and curtail the immigration judges’ discretion to take other factors, such as family ties, into account.

Supporters of Salmon have been on a rolling fast since March, where one person fasts every day in solidarity with his struggle. “It’s to help us have a sense of what sort of loss we’re talking about, what is the extremity of the system we’re talking about. In the end of the day it’s to help us show the system that there are a hell of a lot of people in this community that want him to stay here,” said Janis Rosheuvel, director of Families for Freedom.

Salmon has been actively fighting his deportation order since 2006 in order to stay with his three American citizen children in Brooklyn. “I’m no terrorist, I’m a member of this community. I live in the neighborhood, I’m the next-door neighbor, I’m the person that sit beside you on the train, that walk down the block and say ‘hi.’ I’m not no criminal or no terrorist, I love this country,” he said.

During the event, David Wilson author of The Politics of Immigration debunked some of the myths of the immigration system, attributing the problem to “the idea that people in this country have that immigrants are criminals.” Wilson said now is the time to reach out and re-educate people. “People are more open to new ideas than they’ve ever been…because they’ve been told things that aren’t true,” he said.

Part of the outreach by Families for Freedom is to rally support for the Child Citizen Protection Act. Introduced by Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) in 2008, if passed, the bill would allow discretion for immigration judges when deciding deportation cases that involve the separation of families. As the system stands, “the judges hands are tied,” explains Rosheuvel.  “All the judge can look at is his status and his criminal convictions are. For someone who’s been here for over 30 years, should they not have a chance to have a judge actually judge? It’s a very clear and precise intervention that we’re asking for.”

The bill has so far garnered 16 co-sponsors and is in the House Judiciary Committee.

Edolphus Towns, U.S. Representative of the 10th District of New York was also honored for having been a leader in the fight for immigrant rights and a co-sponsor of the Child Citizen Protection Act. Samuel Pierre, a representative from Towns’ office said “65 percent of the cases that come out of the 10th congressional district deal with immigration, so we take this very seriously.”

“It’s not just about hosting an event; it’s about looking at the fate of an immigrant and 32-year Brooklyn resident from a political, legal, and personal standpoint,” said Rachel Soltis, coordinator of the New Sanctuary Coalition, an interfaith organization working with Salmon’s case.

Salmon’s final deportation hearing is scheduled for July 7. “While I am fighting, I am going to campaign on others’ behalf because what is going on in our communities is uncivilized, it’s oppression,” said Salmon. “We have to put a stop to it now.”

Families for Freedom will host a children’s vigil at Union Square on June 20 at 11 a.m. to urge support for the Child Citizen Protection Act.

For more information on Salmon’s case visit: www.familiesforfreedom.org.

Sonia Sotomayor and the Status Quo

An unprecedented nomination by President Barack Obama has opened the gates for not only a woman, but a Nuyorican Latina to serve as the 111th Supreme Court Justice. As a daughter of Puerto Rican parents, Judge Sonia Sotomayor’s story from rags to riches and possibly to the highest court of the nation, has sparked pride across Latino communities and a heated debate about identity politics.

Introducing Judge Sotomayor in the East Room of the White House, President Barack Obama said, “Over a distinguished career that spans three decades, Judge Sotomayor has worked at almost every level of our judicial system, providing her with a depth of experience and a breadth of perspective that will be invaluable as a Supreme Court justice.”

Judge Sotomayor responded, “I strive never to forget the real world consequences of my decisions on individuals, businesses and government.”

From growing up in a public housing project near Yankee Stadium in the South Bronx to graduating from two of the nations most prestigious universities — Princeton and Yale — for some, Sotomayor has reinvigorated the idea that the American Dream is indeed alive and kicking.

“I think it speaks to what people can become in this country; regardless of where the family is from, they have opportunities in this country,” said Cesar Perales, president and general counsel of Latino Justice PRLDEF. “It has interesting historical grounds,” he added, “people that left Puerto Rico were the poorest of the poor that could not survive, and today are beginning to play important roles that actually affect the lives of the people in Puerto Rico.”

Yet statistics show that Sotomayor’s success story is a rarity amongst the Latino experience. Fast-forwarding 30 years from Sotomayor’s Yale graduation in 1979, and Latinos are still facing educational disparities. Comprising 25 percent of students in grades K-12, Latinos have the highest high school dropout rates and are half as likely to complete college as white undergraduates.  Recent numbers from the National Center for Children in Poverty show that more than 60 percent of all Latino children live in low-income households.

While Sotomayor’s success against provides a model for Latino youth, it also underscores the ongoing struggle for racial equality. Angelo Falcón, co-founder and president of the National Institute for Latino Policy and assistant adjunct professor at Columbia University said Sotomayor is a product of “community struggles to open up those institutions.” He added, “Her struggle, her story of growing up in a housing project, all those things came about as a result of struggle — even the struggle for fair housing.”

Still awaiting confirmation from the U.S. Senate, Sotomayor would replace Justice David Souter who announced his retirement at the end of the court term. Appointed by President George H.W. Bush, Justice Souter firmly established himself among the court’s liberals. With a hard to characterize judicial record, Sotomayor seem to be right in line with her would-be predecessor.

As the first Latina Justice Sotomayor will make history, but will she leave a politically progressive mark on the court?

“I think that perhaps Obama missed an opportunity here,” said Marjorie Cohn, president of the National Lawyers Guild and a professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law on May 29 on Democracy Now! “I’m thrilled that there will be the first Latina on the Supreme Court,” said Cohn, “but I really would have liked to have seen a real progressive counterweight to radical rightists on the court.”

“She basically, politically, maintains the status quo of the court,” said Falcón, who describes her as “pragmatic, centrist, with very moderate positions.”

The symbolism and importance of Sotomayor needs to serve as a way “motivate people to organize and continue to press as opposed to feeling comfortable that we have arrived,” said Falcón. “With all the hype you got to get defensive around something like this,” he said, “when you take an overall picture of the situation within the Latino community there’s a long way to go.”

Permits Please

MORE JOBS ON THE STREETS: Street Vendor Project co-director Michael Wells addresses more than 40 vendors who rallied April 28 at City Hall to advocate City Council to pass a resolution dramatically increasing the number of street vending licenses and permits. “We are asking Mayor Bloomberg to serve the needs of everyday, average New Yorkers,“ Wells said. PHOTO: KAREN YI

For 19 years, Mustafa, an immigrant from Senegal, has been waiting to receive a vending license from the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs. According to the Street Vendor Project, he is one of 13,000 people on the waiting list. After years of waiting, Mustafa has begun selling art in lower Manhattan without a license.

The city caps merchandise vending licenses at 853 and food permits at 3,100 — the same level since 1979 — leaving small entrepreneurial New Yorkers with few alternatives but to sell their products without a license.

More than 40 street vendors rallied on the steps of City Hall April 28 urging the New York City Council to pass the bill, known as Introduction 324, which would create more than 10,000 legal jobs by increasing the number of vendors allowed on the streets, raising numbers for general merchandising to 15,000 and food permits to 25,000, with a provision to increase the number by 5 percent each year afterward.

Intro 324 was introduced in 2006 by Councilmember Charles Barron (D-East New York) and so far has 11 co-sponsors. But even after its Council hearing in November 2008, the bill still has not been passed.

Workers at the Urban Justice Center’s Street Vendor Project say they are getting a record number of calls requesting assistance in getting street vending licenses. With the current economic recession, they say, now is the time to push the bill to the forefront.

“Each day we deliver the disappointing news to dozens of cash-strapped New Yorkers … that they are out of luck,” said Michael Wells, co-director of the Street Vendor Project, composed of more than 750 street vendors working together to create a movement for permanent change.

Vendor advocates also raised concerns over a bill (S04045) introduced by state Senator Daniel Squadron (D-25th District) April 8 that would allow police to fingerprint vendors caught selling products without a license.

This legislation concerns Ivet Bandirma, executive director of Esperanza Del Barrio, an organization that serves to empower street vendors in New York City. Bandirma said that S04045 is “a direct attack on the immigrant population.” It is estimated that more than 80 percent of street vendors are immigrants.

Fingerprinting immigrant vendors puts them in direct contact with the criminal justice system, explains Bandirma, and once immigrants are in the system, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is contacted.

Having met with community groups opposed to the bill in the past several weeks, Squadron has made it clear that this is not an anti-immigrant bill, but rather a way to allow the city to enforce its laws better.

“There is no question the current system is not working for anyone — vendors, local businesses, pedestrians, or communities,” Squadron said. “That’s why I’m working with advocates and others for comprehensive vending reform that is fair, protects the rights of immigrants and improves the system for everybody.”

But protecting immigrants is just one concern, vendor advocates explain. “It’s just wrongheaded,” said Ali Issa, an organizer with the Street Vendors Project. “The approach has nothing to do with the causes of the problem at all, of why people vend without a license.”

“We have some hard-working people, and all they want is the opportunity to work,” said Douglas Lasdon, executive director of the Urban Justice Center, a nonprofit that advocates on behalf of New York City’s most vulnerable communities. “There really is no legitimate policy reason for them not to have that opportunity.”

From the Chicken to the Table

Greg Anderson, 47, moved to New York with his family in 2001 and has since been involved with his community garden in Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn. Twelve members take care of the garden, growing any vegetable in season, from carrots to tomatoes. A year ago, Anderson, the president of the Dean Street Community garden, a two-building wide lot of land between a row of apartments, decided to add a unique twist to this urban garden: chickens. The community garden has about seven chickens that lay anywhere from one to over 20 eggs a day. Anderson and four others take care of the chickens. The eggs are distributed throughout the community and among the garden members. Anderson works with the youth at Queens Community House, a non-profit that provides services to Queen’s diverse population.

How did this community garden begin?

The garden has been here since the late ’80s. There were two houses here that burnt down here. The city leveled everything down, so the community started a green thumb garden.  Probably, like most communities, [the garden] started because it was an empty space [where] trash was building up and people were starting to hang out. So that’s the best way to save the area, to bring in a community garden.

And when did the chickens come?

The chickens came last year. It was me and my wife’s idea.

How did you come up with this idea?

I grew up with chickens. I grew up in Selma, Alabama, and as you get older, you start missing things that you had in an early life. So I started missing being on a farm. We were going to do it first in our backyard. But after researching and seeing how much work is involved and seeing the different benefits of having chickens, and since we were part of the [community] garden, we thought it would be better to do it in the garden. That way, we could use the chickens to educate the community about food source and about the benefits of having chickens.

How is the economy affecting what you’re doing here?

We do spend less time in the garden off-season. But last year we didn’t have as many members as we do now. I’ve seen a lot more members interested in the garden.

Why is this?

Food is more expensive. People are more conscious of their health now and understand that the less processed your food is and the more whole foods that you consume, the better off health-wise you are and even mentally.

Do you think there’s a trend towards community supported agriculture, farmer’s markets and community gardens?

Huge trend, huge trend. I’ve seen it grow in the past five years. We would go to conferences where it would be a few 50-60 people there. But this year going to conferences, they were packed. There were a lot of people interested in working together to do more local growing, that way the food doesn’t have to travel as much. That equals less pollution. People also are looking for a different type of lifestyle, a lifestyle that’s not as busy. Money comes and goes, but when you create a sustainable lifestyle, you find that you don’t need as much money because you can barter for whatever you need; you can grow your own food. Just because you live in an urban area, doesn’t mean you can’t grow your own food or raise your own livestock.

Are these eggs better than what you get at the grocery store?

To me they’re even better than the organic eggs you can get in the store. These are local; these are fresh. My omelets were made with eggs that were laid fresh this morning, you can’t top that. From the chicken to the table, you can’t beat that.

Gearing Up for May Day, Diverse Groups Take to Queens Streets

Against a backdrop of multi-colored flags from Filipino organizations and amidst indigenous music from the Ecuadorian group Raices, day laborers, immigrants and community activists came together to demand dignity and rights for all workers in a protest on April 19 in Woodside, Queens. The march began at 11:30 a.m. as protesters marched along Roosevelt Avenue, chanting “The People United, Will Never Be Defeated!”

Gearing up for the May 1 rally, day laborers and Filipino worker and human right organizations came together to demand an end to deportations, raids and workplace discrimination. Filipino organizations such as the New York Committee for Human Rights in the Philippines (NYCHRP), Filipinas for Rights and Empowerment (FIRE), Philippine Forum, and BAYAN NY/NJ marched with primarily Ecuadorian and Mexican day laborers in a show of solidarity against increased police harassment towards day laborers in Woodside.

“Although the geographies and the locations are different, our communities, and the immigrant workers in our communities, are suffering the same kind of exploitation,” said Valerie Francisco, chair of the Filipinas for Rights and Empowerment (FIRE).

Day laborers say that jobs are becoming fewer and far between while police in the area are stepping up harassment. Jornaleros Unidos de Woodside say police are ticketing day laborers without reason. “We have been affected by the economic crisis, we don’t need increased harassment by police,” said a member from Jornaleros Unidos de Woodside, “but this is not just, all we want is jobs.”

The protest was also a cry against the arrest of 10 day laborers in Oct. 2008 for standing on 69th St. and 37th Av. looking for work.

“We cannot be silent, when our brothers and sisters do not have basic human rights, jobs, security and the ability to support their families,” said Krystle Cheirs, a representative of Gabriela USA. “Together we can combat these injustices in the city we helped build.”

With the unemployment rate at 8.5 percent for March, community organizers are demanding the federal bailout include job creation for the undocumented. “In the stimulus package there’s a lot of money being funneled into workers,” said Francisco, “but jobs for America has to include the plight of immigrant and undocumented workers.”

“We all have different languages, we all have different names, we all come from different countries,” said a representative from NYCHRP addressing the crowd, “but I can guarantee you we have one thing in common, if our home countries, or our parents’ home countries, or our grandparents home countries could offer us jobs, we would not have to be here today. We live in a world where migration is not a choice, it is the only option.”